---
title: "Behringer X-Touch vs Korg nanoKONTROL2"
url: "https://mid1.com/compare/behringer-x-touch-vs-korg-nanokontrol2"
site: "mid1 (mid1.com)"
---

# Behringer X-Touch vs Korg nanoKONTROL2

Both are picks from our guide: Best DAW Control Surfaces (https://mid1.com/guides/daw-controllers/best-daw-control-surfaces).

## Specs head to head

| Spec | Behringer X-Touch | Korg nanoKONTROL2 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Connectivity | USB, Ethernet (RTP MIDI) | USB |
| Compatible devices | Laptop, Desktop (Windows, macOS) | Laptop |

## Behringer X-Touch

Our rating: 9.1 out of 10.

Best for: Mixing a whole section at once, with faders and scribble strips for every channel in view.

The Behringer X-Touch is the closest thing here to a real mixing console. Nine fully motorized faders and eight LCD scribble strips for about $419, roughly double the FaderPort and still well under a professional console's price.

Each of the nine 100 mm faders is touch-sensitive and motorized, moving to show automation across a full mix section rather than one channel at a time. The scribble strips show track names and levels without a separate screen. It speaks both HUI and Mackie Control, so it drops into virtually every major DAW, and an Ethernet port adds RTP MIDI networking alongside USB.

What you pay for that is space and build. At nearly 22 inches deep, it's a real desk commitment, not something you tuck beside a keyboard. It's also Behringer: the price is right, but the switches and encoders don't feel like PreSonus's or Korg's. No software bundle is listed, unlike both cheaper picks.

## Korg nanoKONTROL2

Our rating: 7.8 out of 10.

Best for: A first fader bank for someone mixing in the box who just needs hands on eight channels at once.

The Korg nanoKONTROL2 is the cheap way to stop mixing with a mouse. At about $71, it's the least expensive pick here, and it still covers eight faders, eight knobs and a full set of transport buttons.

Each of the eight channels gets its own fader, knob and record/mute/solo buttons, plus dedicated play, stop, record and marker-navigation controls. It runs on USB bus power alone, no separate supply, and the slim body is thin enough to sit under a laptop.

The tradeoffs match the price. The faders are short-throw and not motorized, so they can't move to show automation you already wrote. It doesn't speak Mackie Control or HUI either, so most DAWs need it mapped by hand. And there's no display, so channel assignments live in memory, not on the hardware.

---

Disclosure: mid1 may earn an affiliate commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to the buyer. Commissions never change our picks.

Source: https://mid1.com/compare/behringer-x-touch-vs-korg-nanokontrol2